Thursday, July 20, 2023

Sexy Senior Citizens

Image by Anne from Pixabay

This is a weekly column consisting of letters to my perspicacious progeny. I write letters to my grandkids — the Stickies — eventual selves to advise them and haunt them after they've become grups and/or I'm deleted.  

Trigger Warning: This column is rated SSC — Sexy Seasoned Citizens — Perusal by kids, callowyutes, or grups may result in a debilitating meltdown.  

Glossary 

Featuring Dana: Hallucination, guest star, and charming literary device  

"You can't help getting older, but you don't have to get old." -George Burns


Dear Stickies and Gentlereaders,

The boilerplate that appears at the top of this column, at least on my website, includes the following statement: Trigger Warning: This column is rated SSC — Sexy Seasoned Citizens  Perusal by kids, callowyutes, or grups may result in a debilitating meltdown. 

The word intersectional belongs between debilitating and meltdown but by leaving it out I avoid the statement slopping over onto the next line creating an unbalanced looking heading. They call me Mister Symmetrical.  

{Some of them call you Mister Anal and think you're unbalanced. Also, I must point out that given that some people read this column via email, on their phones, or even via ink sprayed on dead trees your obsession with symmetry may be pointless.} 

Well, I must point out that sexy senior citizens (SSCs) understand that my love of symmetry, and the pursuit of same, is merely fidelity to my personal aesthetic inclinations. The point is to know what you like without feeling compelled to justify it to others, but also maintaining a live and let-live attitude... in spite of the fact the world is full of philistines.   

SSCs know that you must remain open to expanding your inclinations and be aware that there are always going to be people who can teach you things, right up to the day you're deleted. Some of them are long dead but have left numerous hints and clues behind.

Not all geezers/geezerettes are SSCs, many are just parodies of their younger selves with wrinkles. Or worse yet, a parody that's had so much "work done" they now look like caricatures of their younger selves.

Note to aging famous (and formerly famous) actors and models, presidents, seriously rich people, upper-class people, and members of the lower-upper class who have the time, inclination, and money to strive to look forever 39 (preferably younger):

Knock yourself out. It's your time, inclination, and money. 

However...

I feel compelled to note that wimmin of all ages who strive mightily to look "hot" while simultaneously decrying the toxic male gaze are considered oxymoronic by some of my fellow (but less sensitive) heterosexual, cisgender males.

And, that many men, of all ages, who strive mightily to look hot or cool via ponytails, patchy facial hair, or the I Only Shave Every Other Day Look often look lukewarm at best.   

Also, the faces (beware of close-ups) of the sort of people of a certain age that go out of their way to display pictures or videos of themselves showing how young and healthy they look often resemble robots with worn plastic faces touched up by makeup artists that work at funeral homes.

{Feel better now?}

I do, Dana. Thanks

{So what exactly is a sexy senior citizen given the title of the article? Remember that? How about a concise definition?}

Can't be done, Dana. That would be like trying to concisely/accurately explain the taste of homemade _______ to an AI-powered android. It will never get it, although it will be able to fool many people into thinking it does... but not a SSC of course. 


The most concise definition I've been able to come up with is that a SSC is an individual of a certain age who manages to remain (reasonably but not too) young at heart but has been around long enough, and is savvy enough, to have accumulated a level of wisdom unlikely to be found in the young of body/brain. 

But advanced chronological age is no guarantee of wisdom. There is indeed no fool like an old fool because if they haven't figured it out by then they are unlikely to ever figure it out, and "it" is somewhat variable and hard to define. 

{Could you be a little more vague?}

I warned you. 

{Fine then, what do you mean by savvy? Smart?}

No, because nowadays most people think of smart as intellectually smart. 

A good mechanic that doesn't read anything besides the local paper and repair manuals, is fundamentally kind (but not necessarily warm and fuzzy), honest (but would never tell their spouse that their new ______ makes their butt look big), and has lived long enough to know there is such a thing as human nature and there isn't such a thing as Utopia (or many other things) is not usually called smart. 

But they're definitely savvy, perhaps even wise, prefer traditional (commonsensical) pronouns, and are just as likely to be of benefit to the world as the average professor with a Ph.D., perhaps more likely. In fact, an excellent janitor who embodies the virtues listed in the previous paragraph is more valuable to the world than a professor who doesn't. 


As I mention in my glossary the term sexy senior citizen doesn't refer to physical attractiveness or how sexually active someone is. It's about a certain difficult-to-define something that can be so subtle that only a fellow SSC may be aware they have it. For the record, SSCs know that modesty and restraint are much sexier than cheap displays. 

They're also aware of the fact that much of who they really are, and what they know, is invisible to younger H. sapiens. This gives them an edge in various situations that the young aren't even aware of.

One of the many compensations for being closer to one's inevitable deletion than the young is being able to gently manipulate them without their knowledge. Luckily for them we're more likely to do this for their own good, or frankly, for our own amusement, than to do evil. 

Fortunately for our fellow H. sapiens and unripened progeny, we (mostly) use our secret superpowers for good. 

Poppa loves you,
Have an OK day


Scroll down to share my work/access oldies. Tip me, or Join Cranky's Coffee Club (and access my condensed History of the World), here   

Comments? I post links to my columns on Facebook and Twitter so you can love me, hate me, or try to have me canceled on either site. 


 








Friday, July 14, 2023

The American Experiment

 A Quotable Quotes column

Image by Mike Goad from Pixabay 

This is a weekly column consisting of letters to my perspicacious progeny. I write letters to my grandkids — the Stickies — eventual selves to advise them and haunt them after they've become grups and/or I'm deleted.  

Trigger Warning: This column is rated SSC — Sexy Seasoned Citizens — Perusal by kids, callowyutes, or grups may result in a debilitating meltdown.  

Glossary 

Featuring Dana: Hallucination, guest star, and charming literary device  

"I write my own quotes. Except this one. I obviously stole this from somebody really clever." -Brian Celio


Dear Stickies and Gentlereaders,

For a moment there I thought that Sister Mary Mcgillicuddy had deceived me back in seventh grade. 

I was taught that America was the result of, and continues to be, a grand experiment and that this was, and is, a RBF'D.

Turning to Wikipedia first as I often do when looking for information that might be more neutral in tone and content than what might pop up on the world wide web of all knowledge, I typed the words the American experiment into Wikipedia's search box. 

Hoo-boy. 

Wikipedia returned an entry about a high school history textbook. 

How about if I leave off the the, and just go with American experiment? 

The page "American experiment" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.

Which was followed by a link to the page about the history textbook mentioned above and links to some equally useless entries. Interesting, huh?    

{The the?}

Cool, right? Anyways, I went a-googlin.' No joy till it finally occurred to me to type in: what is the American experiment.

{Well, duh!}

I'm not sure we're allowed to use the word duh anymore. It sounds... triggering?

{Walk on the wild side, Sparky!}

I found a great quote in an editorial published on 11/27/1860 in the New York Daily-Tribune (about the approaching Civil War) that's rather lengthy, but perfect.

We have been regarded as engaged in trying a great experiment, involving not merely the future fate and welfare of this Western continent, but the hopes and prospects of the whole human race. Is it possible for a Government to be permanently maintained without privileged classes, without a standing army, and without either hereditary or self-appointed rulers? Is the democratic principle of equal rights, general suffrage, and government by a majority, capable of being carried into practical operation, and that, too, over a large extent of country?
  
{Without a standing Army? Privileged classes?}

Not now, Dana, I don't want to...

{Wait-wait-wait. What do you think the American experiment is?}

Let's set up a democratic republic to try and avoid the many downsides of pure democracy and see what happens. It hadn't been really tried before, so it was and is an ongoing experiment.  

A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy – A republic replied the Doctor if you can keep it. -From the journal of James McHenry 

The establishment of our new Government seemed to be the last great experiment, for promoting human happiness, by reasonable compact, in civil Society. -G. Washington

The question in society is never whether elites shall rule but which elites are going to rule, and the test in a democracy is to get popular consent to worthy elites. -George Will

Let common sense flow from below. -Joel Kotkin


The experiment was launched, and we got lucky. So did the rest of the world, both directly and indirectly.

{How about some details?}

Nope. This isn't the introduction to a history book; the details are readily available. But be careful and circumspect, Wokies are everywhere. Besides, given how quickly the Wokie virus has spread, and how virulent it is, I'm content to hole up here in the Ohio mountains sending out weekly dispatches to my gentlereaders.   

If the epidemic recedes to the point (there have been some positive developments) where I don't fear a book of any sort would put the denizens of Casa de Chaos in danger perhaps I'll compile my best columns and publish them as a book.  

But the next presidential election is "only" a year and a half away so I'm keeping my head down.

{Fine then. How about some more quotes?} 


- I personally hold that the classical spirit of challenge and self-discovery is a fundamental human trait. By showing how the risk-taking activity of individuals contributes to social benefits, economics helps societies to accommodate what Augustine called our “restlessness of heart.” This is the better part of our human nature. Societies that suppress this restlessness stagnate and die. The issue of morality in economics is neither the fairness of income distribution nor the stability of financial systems. It is how human institutions can be shaped to correspond to human nature — to man’s nature as an innovator.
-Edmund Phelps, 2006 Nobelist in Economics

{So what's next. Are you cautiously optimistic?}

No.


- The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised. -George Will

- We are a pack animal constantly trying to make sure we have high status within the pack; we have a really hard time distinguishing between “having attention” and “deserving attention;” we principally learn by doing and emulation (not by thinking). -Jordan Hall

- We live in a new medieval age, when pseudo-religious “secular-humanist” oligarchs rule, their clericals carry out orders, their scribes record, and their “true believers” genuflect, to promote their self-interests. Hence, Pope Joe, the deep state, the mainstream media... -Judith Thorman

- When highly educated wonks in DC or Manhattan get involved, they often — in their well-credentialed ignorance — pit one of these groups against the others. The least educated are the most despised by the highly educated: working-class men appear to be necessary for Republican fortunes, but they are deemed deplorably unchurched and unworthy of any but the lowest place in the global economy. -Daniel McCarthy

However, my "restlessness of heart" manifests as writing this column and hoping I can help, however insignificantly, to return America to sanity.

Poppa loves you,
Have an OK day


Scroll down to share my work or access oldies. Buy an old crank a coffee? Join Cranky's Coffee Club to read Cranky's History of the World.    

Comments? I post links to my columns on Facebook and Twitter where you can go to love me, hate me, or try to have me canceled.




Friday, July 7, 2023

This Was the Week That Was

The wild week that ended on 7/1/23 
Image by Mark Thomas from Pixabay

This is a weekly column consisting of letters to my perspicacious progeny. I write letters to my grandkids — the Stickies — eventual selves to advise them and haunt them after they've become grups and/or I'm deleted.  

Trigger Warning: This column rated SSC — Sexy Seasoned Citizens — Perusal by kids, callowyutes, or grups may result in debilitating psychological trauma.  


Glossary 

Featuring Dana: Hallucination, guest star, and charming literary device  

"Whenever you put a man on the Supreme Court he ceases to be your friend."  -Harry Truman                                                                                                                                                  

Dear Stickies and Gentlereaders,

With apologies to the various versions of the TV show from which I stole the title of this column, permit me to say: That was some kinda week, eh? The Supremes, still under fire for pointing out that the Constitution actually has nothing to say about abortion — thus forcing the sorta/kinda united states to decide for themselves — were at it again. 

Now they've ruled against colleges and universities using affirmative action when deciding which credential-seeking students to let into top-rated, wildly overpriced colleges and universities top-heavy with administrators, amenities, and bias response teams.

And if that's not bad enough, they also ruled that Uncle Joe, the head of the party of the little guy, didn't have the power to bypass Congress and permit us all to share in the joy of providing student loan relief for students who majored in Critical Pottery theory and the like, and all those bartenders and baristas with Master of Fine Arts degrees.     

{Speaking of abortion, I've got an idea! What if Congress were to pass a law regulating abortion, a compromise (say 15 weeks?) that will satisfy neither side but allow those of us caught in the middle, and the entire nation for that matter, to move on?}  

Actually, that was my idea but since we're... never mind. But there are all sorts of rabid people on both sides that will...

{Yes, there are, and yes, they will. Let 'em march and protest and boycott and decry and submit legislation till their bums fall off. After all, this is a democratic republic. If you want me, I'll be in the bar. There's a really cute new bartender working there.} 


The Supremes also ruled that anyone who self-identifies as LGBTQQIP2SA+ can't force someone who doesn't identify with any of those letters, a number, and a plus sign to provide various and sundry services. 

{You love getting a chance to use the phrase various and sundry, don't you? I think ya got too many letters there, Sparky.}

Well, let's see. lesbian, gay, bisexual, transexual, queer, questioning, intersexual, pansexual, two-spirit, asexual, plus a marginalized minority to be named later. Nope, I'm good. I thought you went to the bar?

{Not open yet. What about furries?, why isn't there an F? Are you a furry phobe?}

Not me, some of my best friends are furries. 

I've emailed a friend of mine, my go-to person for this sort of thing, who works at the headquarters of the IUPPPP&PVTTOT about that very thing but I haven't received a reply. I'm guessing they're covered by the +, as are all sorts of folx we're likely to eventually hear about. 

{IUPP... etc?} 

I've mentioned them once or twice, but it's been a minute. International Union of Perpetually Protesting Protestors and Perpetual Victims of This, That, and the Other Thing. It's a nonprofit that likes to keep a low profile and concentrate on raising money and providing services for all of its many nonprofit member organizations, making sure all the paperwork and permits are up to date and all potentially applicable taxes are legally avoided.     


However, unlike the endless wailing, teeth gnashing, and garment rending that's occurred, and continues, over the repeal of Roe v. Wade things have settled down relatively quickly. 

I'm sure there are any number of plausible reasons I could promulgate as to why but my official, Crank-sanctioned reason is that summer is upon us. It's being widely reported that Normies are taking vacations in record numbers. I think they're putting the perpetual crises promoted by the purple press and social media on hold as best they can, and stocking up on sunscreen.

Multiple polls have been conducted (of course)... 

{By various and sundry polling organizations?}

But I double-dog dare you to read any article that reports on the results of more than one particular poll and claim that you feel confident about the mood of the American people. I'm starting to think all the news is fake.     

As best I can tell we seem to be about evenly split on student loans and forcing businesses to accept work from folx whose lifestyles they don't condone. It looks like a clear majority of us think it's time to end applying affirmative action when deciding on who's worthy of attending the sort of schools mentioned above. 

But given that some of our elite educational institutions have recently declared that there's more than one way to skin a Supreme Court ruling if you're clever/devious enough, this controversy, like the one around abortion, will never go away. 


The Supremes made another ruling that for some mysterious reason didn't get much publicity. Evangelical Christian Gerald Groff quit working for the USPS back in 2019 because the Fedrl Gummit refused to give him Sundays off to observe the sabbath because they wanted him to deliver packages — for Amazon. 
   
He's been battling the Post Office in various and sundry courts ever since to get them to change the rules in what turns out to be a very complicated case. Unfortunately for Mr. Groff, all he "won" was his case being kicked back down the road to a lower court. Follow the link for details. 

The USPS has vowed to keep on fighting this right-wing kook till balance is restored in the Force with the help of your money. 

Poppa loves you,
Have an OK day


Scroll down to share my work/access oldies. Tip me, or Join Cranky's Coffee Club (and access my condensed History of the World), here   

Comments? I post links to my columns on Facebook and Twitter so you love me, hate me, or try to have me canceled on either site. Cranky don't tweet.